Literature Review Markdown Template
Plan and write a true literature review with scope, search method, synthesis matrix, themes, debates, methods, gaps, conclusion, and bibliography.
# Literature Review: [Topic]
**Author:** [Name]
**Review date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Citation style:** [Required style]
## Review question
[Define the focused question this review addresses.]
## Scope and boundaries
- **Included:** [Populations, concepts, source types, languages, or dates]
- **Excluded:** [Explicit exclusions and rationale]
- **Context:** [Discipline, geography, or setting]
## Search and selection method
| Element | Details |
| :--- | :--- |
| Sources searched | [Databases, catalogs, citation chains, or archives] |
| Search date | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Search terms | [Exact query or link to search log] |
| Selection criteria | [Inclusion and exclusion criteria] |
| Appraisal approach | [How relevance and quality were assessed] |
Do not describe the review as systematic unless the method meets the applicable standard.
## Synthesis matrix
| Source | Context and question | Method and sample/material | Main finding | Limitation | Theme |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| [Author, year] | [Scope] | [Design] | [Supported finding] | [Limitation] | [Theme] |
## Thematic synthesis
### Theme 1: [Theme name]
[Synthesize how multiple sources address this theme. Compare evidence rather than listing summaries.]
### Theme 2: [Theme name]
[Synthesis with citations.]
## Agreements and debates
- **Areas of agreement:** [Claims supported across sources and relevant caveats]
- **Debates or contradictions:** [Competing findings, theories, or interpretations]
- **Possible explanations:** [Differences in context, definitions, samples, or methods]
## Methodological patterns
[Compare common designs, measures, source bases, strengths, and recurring limitations.]
## Gaps and future questions
- [Understudied population, context, mechanism, method, or unresolved question]
## Conclusion
[Answer the review question at the strength supported by the literature. State boundaries and remaining uncertainty.]
## Bibliography
- [Complete citation in the required style]
Literature Review: [Topic]
Author: [Name]
Review date: YYYY-MM-DD
Citation style: [Required style]
Review question
[Define the focused question this review addresses.]
Scope and boundaries
- Included: [Populations, concepts, source types, languages, or dates]
- Excluded: [Explicit exclusions and rationale]
- Context: [Discipline, geography, or setting]
Search and selection method
| Element | Details |
|---|---|
| Sources searched | [Databases, catalogs, citation chains, or archives] |
| Search date | YYYY-MM-DD |
| Search terms | [Exact query or link to search log] |
| Selection criteria | [Inclusion and exclusion criteria] |
| Appraisal approach | [How relevance and quality were assessed] |
Do not describe the review as systematic unless the method meets the applicable standard.
Synthesis matrix
| Source | Context and question | Method and sample/material | Main finding | Limitation | Theme |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Author, year] | [Scope] | [Design] | [Supported finding] | [Limitation] | [Theme] |
Thematic synthesis
Theme 1: [Theme name]
[Synthesize how multiple sources address this theme. Compare evidence rather than listing summaries.]
Theme 2: [Theme name]
[Synthesis with citations.]
Agreements and debates
- Areas of agreement: [Claims supported across sources and relevant caveats]
- Debates or contradictions: [Competing findings, theories, or interpretations]
- Possible explanations: [Differences in context, definitions, samples, or methods]
Methodological patterns
[Compare common designs, measures, source bases, strengths, and recurring limitations.]
Gaps and future questions
- [Understudied population, context, mechanism, method, or unresolved question]
Conclusion
[Answer the review question at the strength supported by the literature. State boundaries and remaining uncertainty.]
Bibliography
- [Complete citation in the required style]
When to use this template
Use this to synthesize multiple sources around a defined question for a paper, thesis chapter, or evidence review. Use a separate reading-note format for one source.
Section guide
- Question, scope, and search
- Make the review boundaries and source-selection process visible.
- Matrix and thematic synthesis
- Compare sources across findings, methods, limitations, and themes.
- Gaps and conclusion
- Explain what the body of literature supports, disputes, and leaves unresolved.
How to use this template
- 1
Copy the Markdown
Click the Copy button above to put the full template on your clipboard.
- 2
Paste into your editor
Paste into the mdkit editor, a repository, a notes app, or another Markdown editor. Check tables and task lists in your target renderer because Markdown support varies.
- 3
Fill in your content
Replace bracketed examples with verified information, adapt fields to your context, and remove sections that do not apply.
- 4
Check before you use it
- This structure does not by itself make a review systematic; use applicable protocols and reporting standards when claiming a systematic review.
- Database access, search syntax, citation style, and appraisal methods depend on the discipline and assignment.
Template details
What it solves
A literature-review structure shifts work from isolated paper summaries to a transparent, question-led synthesis across multiple sources.
Key features
- Research question, boundaries, and search method
- Multi-source synthesis matrix
- Themes, agreements, debates, and methodology comparison
- Evidence gaps, conclusion, and bibliography
Pro tips
- >Record searches and inclusion decisions while researching, not after writing.
- >Organize prose by themes or debates rather than one paragraph per paper.
- >Distinguish an absence of evidence from evidence that an effect is absent.
Useful Markdown tools
Start in the Markdown editor, then use a relevant tool when you need to format or export the finished document.
Related templates
Research Paper Abstract
Draft a structured research abstract with background, objective, methods, results, conclusion, keywords, and journal-specific checks.
Cornell Notes
Take Cornell-style notes in Markdown with a learning objective, cue questions, detailed notes, a summary, and prompts for active review.
Research-Based User Persona
Synthesize user research into behaviors, context, jobs to be done, needs, barriers, evidence, and confidence without demographic stereotypes.